The Leadership Initiative for Public Health in East Africa

Personal tools

Log in
Join

Modelling Malaria Risk in East Africa at High-spatial Resolution

j.1365-3156.2005.01424.x

Description

Keywords: East Africa, malaria parasite prevalence, remote sensing, mapping Objectives: Malaria risk maps have re-emerged as an important tool for appropriately targeting the limited resources available for malaria control. In Sub-Saharan Africa empirically derived maps using standardized criteria are few and this paper considers the development of a model of malaria risk for East Africa. Methods: Statistical techniques were applied to high spatial resolution remotely sensed, human settlement and land-use data to predict the intensity of malaria transmission as defined according the childhood parasite ratio (PR) in East Africa. Discriminant analysis was used to train environmental and human settlement predictor variables to distinguish between four classes of PR risk shown to relate to disease outcomes in the region. Results: Independent empirical estimates of the PR were identified from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (n=330). Surrogate markers of climate recorded on-board earth orbiting satellites, population settlement, elevation and water bodies all contributed significantly to the predictive models of malaria transmission intensity in the sub-region. The accuracy of the model was increased by stratifying Africa into two ecological zones. In addition, the inclusion of urbanization as a predictor of malaria prevalence, whilst reducing formal accuracy statistics, nevertheless improved the consistency of the predictive map with expert opinion malaria maps. The overall accuracy achieved with ecological and urban stratification was 62% with surrogates of precipitation and temperature being among most discriminating predictors of the PR. Conclusions: It is possible to achieve a high degree of predictive accuracy for Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence in East Africa using high-spatial resolution environmental data. However, discrepancies were evident from mapped outputs from the models which were largely due to poor coverage malaria training data and the comparable spatial resolution of predictor data. These deficiencies only be addressed by more random, intensive small areas studies of empirical estimates of PR

Remote Size

10.0 kB

Remote Content type

text/html

Remote Modification Date

Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:30:39 GMT

HEALTH Alliance